Current:Home > StocksAppeals court upholds ruling requiring Georgia county to pay for a transgender deputy’s surgery-InfoLens
Appeals court upholds ruling requiring Georgia county to pay for a transgender deputy’s surgery
View Date:2025-01-10 13:35:43
ATLANTA (AP) — A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s ruling that a Georgia county illegally discriminated against a sheriff’s deputy by failing to pay for her gender-affirming surgery.
In its ruling Monday, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said it was tasked with determining whether a health insurance provider can be held liable under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for denying coverage for a procedure because an employee is transgender. The three-judge panel decided in a 2-1 vote that it can and that the lower court had ruled correctly.
Houston County Sgt. Anna Lange, an investigator for the Houston County sheriff’s office, had sued Sheriff Cullen Talton and the county in 2019 after she was denied coverage.
“I have proudly served my community for decades and it has been deeply painful to have the county fight tooth and nail, redirecting valuable resources toward denying me basic health care – health care that the courts and a jury of my peers have already agreed I deserve,” Lange said in a news release from the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund, which represented her.
A woman who answered the phone at the sheriff’s office Tuesday said she would pass along a message seeking comment.
U.S. District Court Judge Marc Treadwell ruled in 2022 that the county’s refusal to cover Lange’s prescribed gender-affirmation surgery amounted to illegal sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Treadwell’s order cited the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2020 decision finding that a Michigan funeral home could not fire an employee for being transgender.
The judge ordered the county’s insurance plan to pay for the surgery and Lange eventually underwent the procedure. A jury awarded Lange $60,000 in damages in 2022.
The county sought to undo Treadwell’s order and the damage award.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 says an employer cannot “discriminate against any individual with respect to his (or her) compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”
The 11th Circuit opinion says the Supreme Court clarified in another Georgia case that discrimination based on the fact that someone is transgender “necessarily entails discrimination based on sex.”
veryGood! (22)
Related
- Smithfield agrees to pay $2 million to resolve child labor allegations at Minnesota meat plant
- BITFII Introduce
- Trump breaks GOP losing streak in nation’s largest majority-Arab city with a pivotal final week
- Princess Kate makes rare public appearance after completing cancer chemo
- Will the NBA Cup become a treasured tradition? League hopes so, but it’s too soon to tell
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Something Corporate
- Deebo Samuel explains 'out of character' sideline altercation with 49ers long snapper, kicker
- Michael Jordan and driver Tyler Reddick come up short in bid for NASCAR championship
- California voters reject measure that would have banned forced prison labor
- ONA Community Introduce
Ranking
- A Pipeline Runs Through It
- 'Devastation is absolutely heartbreaking' from Southern California wildfire
- Brianna “Chickenfry” LaPaglia Explains Why She’s Not Removing Tattoo of Ex Zach Bryan’s Lyrics
- Steelers shoot for the moon ball, but will offense hold up or wilt in brutal final stretch?
- Stop smartphone distractions by creating a focus mode: Video tutorial
- Suspected shooter and four others are found dead in three Kansas homes, police say
- Tennessee fugitive accused of killing a man and lying about a bear chase is caught in South Carolina
- Arizona Supreme Court declines emergency request to extend ballot ‘curing’ deadline
Recommendation
-
California Gov. Gavin Newsom will spend part of week in DC as he tries to Trump-proof state policies
-
AIT Community Introduce
-
Wisconsin’s high court to hear oral arguments on whether an 1849 abortion ban remains valid
-
Firefighters make progress, but Southern California wildfire rages on
-
2 weeks after Peanut the Squirrel's euthanasia, owner is seeking answers, justice
-
2025 NFL Draft order: Updated first round picks after Week 10 games
-
‘Heretic’ and Hugh Grant debut with $11 million, but ‘Venom: The Last Dance’ tops box office again
-
Steelers shoot for the moon ball, but will offense hold up or wilt in brutal final stretch?